D6 · Forming: the retelling

Retell the whole model with its forms inside it

D6 brings the population model and the branch accounts into one explanation. A reader should be able to move from a broad idea to an organizational form, then to a community, and see what each level adds.

Where this stage starts

C5 supplied the earlier account of the whole model. The return to communities tested and revised that model in D1 to D3. D4 proposed shared forms, and D5 wrote their accounts. D6 starts from those records, including unresolved cases and the proposals left by the branch accounts.

What the aggregator does

The aggregator works through the model's aggregate dimensions. For each part, it says what each form does there: adds local detail, restricts the claim to certain conditions, replaces a way of doing the work, or leaves it unchanged. The explanation names the evidence and the communities for each difference.

The best examples come with a weak fit. If members of one form disagree, the aggregator considers whether this is ordinary local variation, unresolved evidence or a possible further distinction. It cannot invent a subform to remove the awkward case.

The whole account is then rewritten with those differences inside it. The figure shows where forms differ within the model; a list of clusters beside an unchanged diagram does not meet the task. The account also explains the communities that needed no adaptation and those the model could not explain, and it assumes no common history for either set.

Evidence that coordination continued or ended comes from the records, and silence is reported as silence. Canvas information can show an outcome, but any part it plays in interpretation is declared.

There is a firm limit: the D3 model and the D4 tree stay fixed. A new idea found while writing goes into a separate proposal, without the validation the earlier model received. Applying it would need a further return to the affected communities.

What the next stage receives

E1 receives the integrated retelling, its evidence links and a separate list of unvalidated proposals. It can audit what the completed run supports and keep ideas produced at the end apart from claims tested during the return.