r/placeAn organizational fruit fly

The three model-building instruments, side by side

Original document, reproduced unchanged. Exact Markdown. Carried by all 14 R6 checkpoints (workspace/). It is not in the repository. sha256 71be757f136a3b62. These instructions govern research runs, not checkpoint interviews. They keep the run's own words: a room is a community, a mark an artwork, the analyst the aggregator, the case lead the community coder and the global model the population model.

Target length: under 1,950 words. Sixth, 7 October: coder-theme names at R3; C4 not given to the field lead (J). Fifth, 7 October: the tools and the organizing-end record, after Claude's audit and OpenAI's repair. Fourth, 5 October: after Codex's sibling-contract review (REVIEW-codex.md), J's rule on theory and an independent check; then the field's Part I set to J's order and Codex's field review; recovery from hidden snapshots (J, 6 October).

Three instruments build models: the global aggregator (the rooms together), the case aggregator (one room, run per room) and the field model (r/place, run once). The two new ones are siblings of the global one. They share its questions, tiers, rules and file formats by shipping the same files, pinned by hash in PINNED.tsv, never by paraphrase. Each sibling's contract holds a reading key, a rule table and its own stages; PROFILE.md holds the fields its files add or replace. If a pinned file changes, the siblings fail their check until rebuilt, so the three cannot drift apart unnoticed.

Shared files

File Global aggregator Case aggregator Field model
CONTRACT-aggregator.md the contract §1 to §3, §5's weak-absence rule, §6's stopping rule the same, through the room contract
METHOD.md whole first section first section
WRITING.md whole whole whole
SCHEMA-adaptations.md whole, from D1 §1 §1
stage cards C1, C2, C3, C5 the stages R3 to R6 follow them the same
FLEET.md, stage cards B2, B3, B4 at fleet stages none Part I's pilot, placement fleet and adjudication
v32 coder contracts and tools (emit.py, close_run.py, cite.py, read.py, fleet.py, audit_fleet.py, tree_builder.py) none none: the coding is closed Part I, from F0 through the fleet
stage card E1 the claims audit claims.md claims.md
stage card C4; HANDLER.md on the field the stage none not given; field/ follows it
room-model/CONTRACT.md none the contract Part II
PROFILE.md none every file every file
full papers the shelves Gioia, Corley and Hamilton; Puranam, Alexy and Reitzig its own shelf and READING.md: Gioia, Corley and Hamilton at FA; Puranam, Alexy and Reitzig, Padgett and Powell, Lewin and Volberda, and Ostrom at R5

The tiers, the IDs, and where theory enters

Gioia's name Global aggregator Case aggregator Field model
first-order concepts sub:c0042 c0042 c0042
first-order, consolidated within a case coder themes sub:t07 coder themes t07, closed coder themes t01 on, v32's IDs: gates g01 built after every return is read, placed by a fleet, adjudicated, then emitted
first-order, consolidated across cases T3-, never a construct's name none none
second-order themes T4-, constructs T4-, constructs T4-, constructs
aggregate dimensions D, constructs D, constructs D, constructs
the model P K C R A L, findings F, propositions N the same the same, with field_level, groups, room_side

Theory (J, 5 October 2026: "In gch one cannot use theory for the first order ... Only first order get no theory in the labeling"). In all three, the first order carries no theory: codes, coder themes as coded, and the global third-order themes. Second-order themes (T4) and dimensions are constructs from the cut, declared borrowed (recalled until the literature stage), adapted or coined, and may take any literature's names, the four problems' included; no T4 tier copies the four problems. The siblings have three levels to the global's four, so theory enters one step earlier in their build, at the same Gioia tier. From R3 a sibling may also give a coder theme a theory name (names.jsonl), exports keeping its label (J).

IDs are bare inside each instrument. On export the controller prefixes every ID and reference with sub: or field:, so denmark:T4-002 and the global T4-002 can share a ledger line.

r/place's coder themes are built after reading every return, under gates, placed by a fleet: a declared difference. Its unresolved codes form one residue theme, marked in theme_map.jsonl and never read as a kind. The global aggregator receives only field/.

Deliverables

Global aggregator (stage) Case aggregator Field model
none none F0: v32 steps 1 to 3 through the fleet; snap after-fleet
prior.md (B1) R1, written after the coding, and so marked FA, after the v32 boundary steps and before the returns are read, saying what the lead had seen; with the group and phase rules
reading notes and organizing_end-A1.jsonl (A1) R2: block notes, episodes.jsonl, organizing_end.json FA: block notes, episodes.jsonl, groups.jsonl, interactions.jsonl, phases.jsonl, organizing_end.json
scheme, gates, pilot, fleet, adjudication (B1 to B4) none FB and FC: the gates; pilot with fresh readers; a placement fleet over whole threads; snap after-placement
none none FD: adjudication and the blind sample; emission with theme_map.jsonl; counter-reading; the six v32 outputs, INTERVIEW-coding.md; snap coding-closed
form pass (C1 §7) R3, over the room's codes R3, over r/place's codes
fourth/fourth.jsonl, dimensions.jsonl, assignments_final.jsonl, structure.md (C1, C2) R3, assignments.jsonl placing coder themes R3, the same, with field_level
concept.md, model/ files, model.md, stories (C2) R4; stories read against episodes R4, with levels and room side; read against episodes and phases
one reviewer, before the final passes (C2 §6) one critic inside R4, before the final passes; its session discarded the same, its session kept
literature-C3.md, mapping-C3.jsonl, switch records (C3) R5: C3 §1 and leg 3; legs 1 and 2 do not run R5, with levels and the four works of READING.md
field-C4.md (C4) none supplies field/
account.md, propositions.jsonl, data_structure-C5.md, figure-C5.md (C5) R6; no third-order column R6
three readers (C5) none two readers
findings.jsonl same same
claims-E1.md (E1) claims.md claims.md and the audit scripts
none confidence.jsonl, sealed confidence.jsonl, sealed
interview briefs INTERVIEW.md at the close INTERVIEW-coding.md at coding-closed, INTERVIEW.md at the close
D1 to D6, E2 none none

The critic

J, 5 October 2026: every room gets the critic where the global reviewer sits (C2 §6): inside R4, after the pass the lead expects to keep and before the final passes, so its fixes can reopen the loop. r/place's runs the same way.

Order, sealing, and confidence

  1. The case aggregators and the field model close, and the controller seals each confidence.jsonl (hashed with the model version, kept where no agent can write) before anyone sees the global model.
  2. The global aggregator reads no case-aggregator output before its own freeze. It reads field/ at C4 and nothing else from the field.
  3. At the return, D2 sends the case aggregators if enough rooms have one by then, else the case leads (J, 5 October 2026).

The siblings implement points 1 and 2. Point 3 and the use of the sealed grades change the global aggregator; they are listed for J, not made:

What the runtime has to do

The contracts assume a controller the community-coder runtime (coder_model/) does not yet have; the coding handler confirms and sizes this: